<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephen Crooks Experience Economy Blog &#187; iTunes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/tag/itunes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog</link>
	<description>Building Better Brand Experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 03:20:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Apple should buy Nintendo</title>
		<link>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/03/18/why-apple-should-buy-nintendo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/03/18/why-apple-should-buy-nintendo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Crooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AppleTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Image via CrunchBase



<p>It&#8217;s no secret that Apple is cash rich, currently sitting on 40  billion in reserves and in the past few months they&#8217;ve been publicly  stating that they have some desire to begin spending it.&#160; Well I have an  idea: buy Nintendo (or a large stake in the company).&#160; Why?&#160; Well [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl style="width: 260px;" class="wp-caption alignright">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/product/apple-tv"><img src="http://www.crunchbase.com/assets/images/resized/0003/1399/31399v1-max-250x250.jpg" alt="Image representing Apple TV as depicted in Cru..." title="Image representing Apple TV as depicted in Cru..." width="250" height="172"></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com">CrunchBase</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>It&#8217;s no secret that Apple is cash rich, currently sitting on 40  billion in reserves and in the past few months they&#8217;ve been publicly  stating that they have some desire to begin spending it.&nbsp; Well I have an  idea: buy Nintendo (or a large stake in the company).&nbsp; Why?&nbsp; Well read  on.&nbsp; </p>
<p>The race to control your TV has been going on for years,  all the major players of the computer industry have some product or  service designed to web enable your television.&nbsp; In many ways he who  controls the tv set will become the next cable provider.&nbsp; Clearly a lot  of money is at stake, what&#8217;s been lacking is a simple mainstream system  that your grandma would understand and be able to use.&nbsp; A web enabled TV  would allow distributors to sell movies or other content straight off  the internet to be watch somewhere other than behind your desk.&nbsp; </p>
<p>This  brings me to Apple.&nbsp; A few years ago Apple released their foray into  the living room with <a class="zem_slink" href="http://www.apple.com/appletv" title="Apple TV" rel="homepage">AppleTV</a>.&nbsp; A small little box that connects the web  to your TV.&nbsp; As with all things Apple the interface is simple, easy to  use.&nbsp; Users connect with iTunes and are able to rent or buy digital  versions of top shows and movies.&nbsp; The more units in the marketplace,  the more content Apple could make money with.&nbsp; But the problem?&nbsp; Well  they don&#8217;t sell.&nbsp;&nbsp; People cannot be convinced to pay several hundred  dollars for a device that really from a layman&#8217;s point of view an  expensive indulgence that on it&#8217;s own provides little value.&nbsp; Are you  going to convince someone with a home computer to pay good money so they  can watch YouTube on their TV?&nbsp; Nope.&nbsp; Apple&#8217;s little box is also  limited in what content they can play.&nbsp; Due to patent restrictions,  desire for format control, etc. Apple really only plays Apple format  material preventing you from watching your video collection that may be  encoded in other file types. </p>
<p>The Sollution. Buy Nintendo, and  package AppleTV as part of the Wii console.&nbsp; The value is in the gaming  device &#8211; popular with women, families and the less geeky crowd.&nbsp; The  AppleTV becomes an additional feature as opposed to the reason for  purchase.&nbsp; Or alternatively those who are seeking out an AppleTV will  have an additional reason to purchase the device.</p>
<p>Wii ownership  would allow Apple to exploit it&#8217;s built in audience base.&nbsp; The new  device would be backwards compatible allowing for easy upgrade.&nbsp;&nbsp; You  suddenly take a device that in the eyes of the mainstream consumer is  complex, unwanted and expensive into a must have device.&nbsp; Existing  iPhone/iPod device users will also welcome the device and it&#8217;s easy  integration with their existing products. </p>
<p>In addition to the  Wii, Nintendo has many patents and hand held gaming devices that could  further expand with reach.&nbsp; Porting games over to the iPad and iPhone  platform.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Could be a smart move for Apple.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
<div style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;" class="zemanta-pixie"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/4dcd07c5-19d3-4eb0-8099-e029fdc0c032/" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"><img style="border: medium none; float: right;" class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=4dcd07c5-19d3-4eb0-8099-e029fdc0c032" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]"></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script type="text/javascript" src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" defer="defer"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/03/18/why-apple-should-buy-nintendo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Companies Copy, Great Companies Leapfrog</title>
		<link>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/02/17/good-companies-copy-great-companies-leapfrog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/02/17/good-companies-copy-great-companies-leapfrog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Crooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ITunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/?p=191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[



Apple&#8217;s original PDA, helped establish the market Palm took over, in part due to major innovations the company made.  



<p>Leapfrogging &#8211; It&#8217;s a phenomenon that I see occur time and time again, where the industry leader is blindsided by a leap in innovation &#8211; an innovation they should have owned.  Yet so many organizations still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Newton-IMG_0320_cleanup.JPG"><img title="Photograph showing Apple Newton hand held comp..." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/Newton-IMG_0320_cleanup.JPG/300px-Newton-IMG_0320_cleanup.JPG" alt="Photograph showing Apple Newton hand held comp..." width="300" height="258" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Apple&#8217;s original PDA, helped establish the market Palm took over, in part due to major innovations the company made.  <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Newton-IMG_0320_cleanup.JPG"></a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p>Leapfrogging &#8211; It&#8217;s a phenomenon that I see occur time and time again, where the industry leader is blindsided by a leap in innovation &#8211; an innovation they should have owned.  Yet so many organizations still only make marginal/incremental enhancements to their products or services.   But in this globally competitive world minor tweaks and updates aren&#8217;t going to keep your company at the top of the pecking order.</p>
<p>In Canada there are a lot of companies that hit it big with a one-off idea.  Which they do very well with is during the growth cycle  &#8211; but once the market becomes either over saturated or is on the decline where you really start to see the &#8220;hold the fort&#8221; mentality.   Their original &#8220;winning formula&#8221; is really what  prevents the reinventing of the wheel.    Being market leader in a dying market to most would seem to be a losing  proposition.  Ideally a company should position itself as leader in a  growth (or stable) market.  But time and time again we see organizations that through indecision or paranoia fail to grasp the concept of radical change &#8211; until they wake up and can&#8217;t figure out why their stock is worthless.</p>
<p>This happened recently when Toronto based CD/DVD maker Cinram lost the contract with a major studio.   It should be no surprise to anyone that the concept of the pressed disk is dying &#8211; fast.  And this is something that was easily predictable when iTunes or Napster first launched.  But here you have a company that once was trading  5 years ago in the $30 range, now sits in the $1.20 range.  Not to pick on any one company &#8211; but what was their plan 5 years ago to deal with the change in markets &#8211; what was their leapfrog strategy?    Without one marginal changes won&#8217;t grow the company.</p>
<p>Another example is Palm, the makers of handheld PDA&#8217;s.  This company essentially invented the concept and the market for the smart handheld device, but a company that once was market leader has since been very quickly trounced on by Apple.  The iPhone/iTouch isn&#8217;t any Sci-fi alien technology &#8211; it&#8217;s all off the shelf, available to anyone.  What Apple did is they effectively re-thought, re-engineered the concept of of a PDA.  But because Apple lacked any attachment to previous designs, standards, ways of thinking &#8211; they were able to leapfrog Palm and come out with a better device.</p>
<p>Leapfrogging as a concept is not that hard to understand &#8211; but it means a company has to ditch what it knows now and embrace blue-sky thinking.  The question of organizational strength is whether or not a company is capable to get past the silo thinking and be progressive enough to go to the next level.</p>
<p><strong>Leapfrogging Techniques: </strong></p>
<p>- Look 5 Years into the Future, and not at what pundits or commentators are talking about &#8211; but rather what are the geo/political/social/technological developments that you see as becoming a huge trend.</p>
<p>- Forget everything you know &#8211; depending on if you offer a product or service &#8211; depart from your offering in brainstorming sessions.  Think more holistically about what it is your company has been put on earth to solve.  Off the top of my head: Palm = your data where ever you are.  Cinram  = Permanent content storage.</p>
<p>- It&#8217;s about evolving not finding one off fixes.  As much as the iPod was a major leapfrog device &#8211; the product continued to evolved incrementally, and so too with the various subsequent leapfrog devices Apple has since released.<br />
Related articles by</p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.thestar.com/business/article/758639--cinram-stock-plunges-as-warner-ends-contract">Cinram stock plunges as Warner ends contract</a> (thestar.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=2508475">Cinram shares dive as biggest customer ends deal</a> (financialpost.com)</li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/02/02/rumor-apple-developing-second-tablet-device-made-from-unicorn/">Rumor: Apple developing second tablet device, made from unicorn tears</a> (tuaw.com)</li>
</ul>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/a4705ea4-05fe-4767-bb81-6e1558834f19/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a4705ea4-05fe-4767-bb81-6e1558834f19" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.stephencrooks.com/blog/2010/02/17/good-companies-copy-great-companies-leapfrog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
